The Imperial Palace was once again trapped in the “porcelain doorâ€. The security protection of the Forbidden City caused a deeper accident in the porcelain ware damaged by Weibo. On July 31, the Palace Museum confirmed the incident. Through "online exposure", the 26-day-old Imperial Palace "ceremonial door" was damaged and the surface of the artifacts was gradually damaged. However, not more than two months ago on May 8th, the National Palace Museum in Beijing shocked the country with the theft of the cultural relics. However, less than a month ago on April 18th, the Taipei Palace Museum also experienced major security omissions, resulting in the emergence of a surveillance system. In the “vacuum†period of 6 hours, all monitoring, access control, and infrared sensing systems in the pavilion suddenly failed. After 6 hours, Taipower temporarily relied on temporary power supply to restore the system operation.
From the “lost door†to the “pennant gate†to today’s “porcelain door,†the Beijing Palace Museum, which was trapped in the “triple doorâ€, faced a crisis of confidence. From the frequent accidents of the Beijing Imperial Palace exhibits to the crisis of the failure of the security system of the National Palace Museum in Taipei, the security situation of the national key cultural relics protection units, especially the cultural relics museum, has caused us to ponder and worry. Comprehensively strengthening the safety precautions for the protection of cultural relics in China has received special attention and attention from the government and the society.
As the highest temple of the Wenbo community, the first class cultural relics in the Palace Museum were damaged due to scientific researchers' mistakes. A senior member of the civil and cultural circles commented that the serious accidents of the Song Dynasty porcelain kiln porcelain were unprecedented since the establishment of the Palace Museum. It is naturally inevitable that so many public disputes will be triggered. One of the public's hot spots for questioning is to question the professionalism of the Forbidden City. Second is to question why the Forbidden City will be made public after more than 20 days of the accident. The incident itself deserves a thorough reflection by the department.
It is reported that the 1990s was the period when the government invested heavily in cultural relic protection and achieved the most significant results. During this period, the central government allocated 700 million yuan for special grants for the protection of cultural relics, and arranged more than 1,000 cultural relic protection and protection projects. A large number of cultural relics that were near to destruction were properly protected.
If the key cultural objects are stolen, the first time people will think of is whether there is a security loophole in the security system of the cultural relics protection unit? The security needs of cultural relics museums are different from other common areas. Given the special nature and importance of cultural relics protection, a higher level and more stringent regulations and requirements have been put forward for the security system. Therefore, how to formulate an effective and effective public security prevention and control system against the special needs of cultural relic museums is bound to become the key to heritage protection.
It is reported that the first modern security technology prevention system of the Forbidden City began in 1987 and was completed after more than ten years. In 1998, the Palace Museum really entered the "technical defense era." At present, the National Palace Museum has installed at least 1,600 burglar alarms, 3,700 smoke detectors and 400 cameras.
Even if the security technology prevention system is "intimidating," it may seem impregnable on the surface, but in reality it is hard to prevent. Security short board makes it difficult for cultural relics to get rid of "bad luck." Therefore, we should profoundly reflect on the fact that even if there is a strong security system as the backing, application and management are very important and worth testing. The normalization and refinement of the security system can only be continuously strengthened in the details of layer audits and enhanced warnings. Therefore, simple technology theft prevention is only superficial, and ultimately must rely on "heart defense". Only the improvement of responsibility and prevention of psychological responsibility in place can build an indestructible "protection wall" for anti-theft and security protection of cultural relics.
On May 11th, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage issued the “Emergency Notice on Practical Strengthening of Cultural Relic Safety Work†and asked local cultural relics bureaux to learn from the theft cases in the National Palace Museum and earnestly strengthen cultural relics safety work.
It is reported that since 2009, China's museum security cases have shown a rebound trend, and the cultural and security situation is not optimistic.
According to the relevant person in charge of the State Administration of Cultural Heritage, the National Twelfth Five-Year Plan for Cultural Relics Protection Projects and Funding Requirements will also be introduced in the near future. Among them, the investment protection of museums and other cultural relics will be a focus of planning, and the State Administration of Cultural Heritage will join the Central Government. The financial department gives priority support in accordance with the relevant regulations of the country. The funding for the construction of cultural relics during the 12th Five-Year Plan period has greatly increased, which is about five times that of the “Eleventh Five-Year Planâ€. This will bring a new market for the security industry. According to experts, a provincial museum's security investment is generally more than 10 million yuan, which is undoubtedly a huge market for the security industry.
China's museum security work has a close relationship with the security industry and security companies. Under the relatively serious situation of museum security in China, security companies should take up the incumbent responsibility of the uprising. Of course, museum security needs will also promote the development of the security industry. But on the other hand, it also puts forward more high-level requirements for security companies. With the country's further attention and attention to cultural relics security, security companies will face more opportunities and challenges.
Although in recent years, the security and investment of Wenbo industry as a security guard has increased year by year, and even the related funding plan during the “12th Five-Year Plan†period has increased to five times during the “Eleventh Five-Year Plan†period, cultural and security security cases still appear. growth trend. Museums such as the Inner Mongolia Museum, the Lechang County Museum of Guangdong Province, the Linfen County Museum of Shanxi Province, the Lincang Ding Village Folk Museum, the Huanggang Museum of Hubei Province, and the Rugao City Museum of Jiangsu Province have lost their collections, were stolen and even stolen. Other vicious cases; imperial tombs, tombs, kiln sites, cave temples, stone carvings, and important ancient buildings have also become high-risk areas for theft, destruction, and destruction. The Wenbo security situation is not optimistic.
Specific to the theft of the National Palace Museum, according to the situation after the disclosure: both the lack of its own management, there are many security monitoring system detection, equipment failure, aging and other issues.
Through the analysis of the case of the Palace Museum, we can see some clues to the security construction of the Wenbo system and find some existing “soft ribsâ€.
1. As a perimeter intrusion detection system for the first line of defense of burglar alarm systems, due to the requirements for the protection of cultural relics, it is not appropriate to invade the entire facade of cultural relics, block defenses, and even damage electronic fences and high-voltage power grids. Detection equipment, and therefore more equipped in foreign countries rarely equipped with outdoor infrared, laser, microwave and other line and field detection equipment. The high false alarm rate of such equipment makes it easy for security personnel to paralyze the “wolf†that frequently appears, and takes it lightly to relax its vigilance.
2. The Imperial Palace porcelain door incident is the failure of the security system. The failure of the system is that the thief cut off the power first. This is exposing a common weakness of existing security systems: Power dependence is strong.
3. Ancient buildings such as the Forbidden City, which are mainly wooden structures, have extremely high fire protection requirements. The infrared camera used at night, due to infrared lighting power is relatively large, thermal effect is obvious, easy to cause fire, so although the National Palace Museum is equipped with nearly 400 cameras, but the night should not be open too much. This is also a common problem of loading multiple electronic devices at the same time.
4. It is also the cause of fire. During the day and night of the Palace Museum, there are two distinct sets of security systems and two-way power supply. In order to prevent fires, at night, the daytime security system will be cut off and the night security system will be switched. This will cause many advanced security systems to completely lose their power due to loss of power.
5. The linear or field intrusion detectors now equipped with linkage cameras for on-site viewing are affected greatly by the season and often fail in rain, fog and snow.
From the “lost door†to the “pennant gate†to today’s “porcelain door,†the Beijing Palace Museum, which was trapped in the “triple doorâ€, faced a crisis of confidence. From the frequent accidents of the Beijing Imperial Palace exhibits to the crisis of the failure of the security system of the National Palace Museum in Taipei, the security situation of the national key cultural relics protection units, especially the cultural relics museum, has caused us to ponder and worry. Comprehensively strengthening the safety precautions for the protection of cultural relics in China has received special attention and attention from the government and the society.
As the highest temple of the Wenbo community, the first class cultural relics in the Palace Museum were damaged due to scientific researchers' mistakes. A senior member of the civil and cultural circles commented that the serious accidents of the Song Dynasty porcelain kiln porcelain were unprecedented since the establishment of the Palace Museum. It is naturally inevitable that so many public disputes will be triggered. One of the public's hot spots for questioning is to question the professionalism of the Forbidden City. Second is to question why the Forbidden City will be made public after more than 20 days of the accident. The incident itself deserves a thorough reflection by the department.
It is reported that the 1990s was the period when the government invested heavily in cultural relic protection and achieved the most significant results. During this period, the central government allocated 700 million yuan for special grants for the protection of cultural relics, and arranged more than 1,000 cultural relic protection and protection projects. A large number of cultural relics that were near to destruction were properly protected.
If the key cultural objects are stolen, the first time people will think of is whether there is a security loophole in the security system of the cultural relics protection unit? The security needs of cultural relics museums are different from other common areas. Given the special nature and importance of cultural relics protection, a higher level and more stringent regulations and requirements have been put forward for the security system. Therefore, how to formulate an effective and effective public security prevention and control system against the special needs of cultural relic museums is bound to become the key to heritage protection.
It is reported that the first modern security technology prevention system of the Forbidden City began in 1987 and was completed after more than ten years. In 1998, the Palace Museum really entered the "technical defense era." At present, the National Palace Museum has installed at least 1,600 burglar alarms, 3,700 smoke detectors and 400 cameras.
Even if the security technology prevention system is "intimidating," it may seem impregnable on the surface, but in reality it is hard to prevent. Security short board makes it difficult for cultural relics to get rid of "bad luck." Therefore, we should profoundly reflect on the fact that even if there is a strong security system as the backing, application and management are very important and worth testing. The normalization and refinement of the security system can only be continuously strengthened in the details of layer audits and enhanced warnings. Therefore, simple technology theft prevention is only superficial, and ultimately must rely on "heart defense". Only the improvement of responsibility and prevention of psychological responsibility in place can build an indestructible "protection wall" for anti-theft and security protection of cultural relics.
On May 11th, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage issued the “Emergency Notice on Practical Strengthening of Cultural Relic Safety Work†and asked local cultural relics bureaux to learn from the theft cases in the National Palace Museum and earnestly strengthen cultural relics safety work.
It is reported that since 2009, China's museum security cases have shown a rebound trend, and the cultural and security situation is not optimistic.
According to the relevant person in charge of the State Administration of Cultural Heritage, the National Twelfth Five-Year Plan for Cultural Relics Protection Projects and Funding Requirements will also be introduced in the near future. Among them, the investment protection of museums and other cultural relics will be a focus of planning, and the State Administration of Cultural Heritage will join the Central Government. The financial department gives priority support in accordance with the relevant regulations of the country. The funding for the construction of cultural relics during the 12th Five-Year Plan period has greatly increased, which is about five times that of the “Eleventh Five-Year Planâ€. This will bring a new market for the security industry. According to experts, a provincial museum's security investment is generally more than 10 million yuan, which is undoubtedly a huge market for the security industry.
China's museum security work has a close relationship with the security industry and security companies. Under the relatively serious situation of museum security in China, security companies should take up the incumbent responsibility of the uprising. Of course, museum security needs will also promote the development of the security industry. But on the other hand, it also puts forward more high-level requirements for security companies. With the country's further attention and attention to cultural relics security, security companies will face more opportunities and challenges.
Although in recent years, the security and investment of Wenbo industry as a security guard has increased year by year, and even the related funding plan during the “12th Five-Year Plan†period has increased to five times during the “Eleventh Five-Year Plan†period, cultural and security security cases still appear. growth trend. Museums such as the Inner Mongolia Museum, the Lechang County Museum of Guangdong Province, the Linfen County Museum of Shanxi Province, the Lincang Ding Village Folk Museum, the Huanggang Museum of Hubei Province, and the Rugao City Museum of Jiangsu Province have lost their collections, were stolen and even stolen. Other vicious cases; imperial tombs, tombs, kiln sites, cave temples, stone carvings, and important ancient buildings have also become high-risk areas for theft, destruction, and destruction. The Wenbo security situation is not optimistic.
Specific to the theft of the National Palace Museum, according to the situation after the disclosure: both the lack of its own management, there are many security monitoring system detection, equipment failure, aging and other issues.
Through the analysis of the case of the Palace Museum, we can see some clues to the security construction of the Wenbo system and find some existing “soft ribsâ€.
1. As a perimeter intrusion detection system for the first line of defense of burglar alarm systems, due to the requirements for the protection of cultural relics, it is not appropriate to invade the entire facade of cultural relics, block defenses, and even damage electronic fences and high-voltage power grids. Detection equipment, and therefore more equipped in foreign countries rarely equipped with outdoor infrared, laser, microwave and other line and field detection equipment. The high false alarm rate of such equipment makes it easy for security personnel to paralyze the “wolf†that frequently appears, and takes it lightly to relax its vigilance.
2. The Imperial Palace porcelain door incident is the failure of the security system. The failure of the system is that the thief cut off the power first. This is exposing a common weakness of existing security systems: Power dependence is strong.
3. Ancient buildings such as the Forbidden City, which are mainly wooden structures, have extremely high fire protection requirements. The infrared camera used at night, due to infrared lighting power is relatively large, thermal effect is obvious, easy to cause fire, so although the National Palace Museum is equipped with nearly 400 cameras, but the night should not be open too much. This is also a common problem of loading multiple electronic devices at the same time.
4. It is also the cause of fire. During the day and night of the Palace Museum, there are two distinct sets of security systems and two-way power supply. In order to prevent fires, at night, the daytime security system will be cut off and the night security system will be switched. This will cause many advanced security systems to completely lose their power due to loss of power.
5. The linear or field intrusion detectors now equipped with linkage cameras for on-site viewing are affected greatly by the season and often fail in rain, fog and snow.
EPDM Rubber Seal Strip ,Door&Window Rubber Seals Co.,Ltd , http://www.nsaluminiumwindows.com